# MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen3.5-Flash

> Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 32.9 to 24.1.
- Both cost about the same: $0.14 input and $0.28 output per million tokens.
- Qwen3.5-Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 137 | 105 |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.9 (#234)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | 1243 |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1412 |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | 221.8 |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2-Flash: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 32.9 (#63)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1404 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.98 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 36.3 (#117)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#84)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1408 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1391 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1324 | 1369 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1399 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.8 (#133)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1392 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 58.2 (#117)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5-Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.