# MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

> MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.8 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-qwen3-5-35b-a3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 47.7 to 39.1.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $2 for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 137 | 118 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $2 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | 1254 |
| SciCode | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1410 |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 23.9 (#158)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1400 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 10% |
| DTBench | — | 80% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.52 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 38.4 (#86)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1404 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 70% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.7 (#73)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1408 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.2 (#122)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1391 | 1379 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | 1458 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1367 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1324 | 1326 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1354 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1377 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1390 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 73.0 (#123)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1379 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#122)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1390 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 58.1 (#118)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1395 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1391 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.8 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 35B-A3B lists at $0.25 and $2.

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.