# MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen3-1.7B

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-qwen3-1-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 38.3 to 16.3.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 26.6 |
| Rank | 138 | 336 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2-Flash: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | — |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Qwen3-1.7B?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen3-1.7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.