# MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen1.5-72B

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-qwen1-5-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.7 to 11.5.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 138 | 285 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1165 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1148 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1164 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1136 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1159 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1110 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1141 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Qwen1.5-72B?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen1.5-72B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.