# MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen Max

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Max in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 38.3 to 22.3.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
- MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 33K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 34.7 |
| Rank | 138 | 230 |
| Context | 262K | 33K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $6.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1269 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Qwen Max?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen Max?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen Max better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.