# MiMo-V2-Flash vs Phi-4 Mini

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-phi-4-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Phi-4 Mini in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.1 to 24.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash and 10.8% for Phi-4 Mini.
- Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Flash.
- MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 30.4 |
| Rank | 137 | 280 |
| Context | 262K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.075 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $0.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)
- Phi-4 Mini: 27.6 (#312)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 25.9% | 10.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)
- Phi-4 Mini: 21.7 (#190)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)
- Phi-4 Mini: 24.8 (#261)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | — |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1324 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Phi-4 Mini?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Phi-4 Mini?

Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Phi-4 Mini share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.