# MiMo-V2-Flash vs phi-3-medium 14B

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.7 to 9.1.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 138 | 306 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | — |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than phi-3-medium 14B?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (36.1 vs 36.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.