# MiMo-V2-Flash vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 50.2.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 138 | 168 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1347 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1322 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1308 |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1299 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.