# MiMo-V2-Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-mistral-medium-3-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 5 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 24.1 to 16.6.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 39.6 |
| Rank | 137 | 151 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | 1263 |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1461 |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1436 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.42 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1432 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1431 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2-Flash: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1222 |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1391 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | 1443 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1453 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1387 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1406 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1324 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1414 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1414 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1372 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Mistral Medium 3.5?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.8 vs 35.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.