# MiMo-V2-Flash vs MiniMax-M3

> MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-minimax-m3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 39.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash and 47.1% for MiniMax-M3.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M3.
- MiniMax-M3 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 43.8 |
| Rank | 138 | 85 |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
- MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | 1482 |
| SciCode | 25.9% | 47.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1469 |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | 640.02 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14.7% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2-Flash: —
- MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.7% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,158 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
- MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1447 |
| SimpleBench | — | 45.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 65.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 14% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 8% |
| DTBench | — | 78.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.95 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.4 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
- MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 71.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 18% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
- MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1461 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2-Flash: —
- MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1253 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1435 |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
- MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | 1381 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
- MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1433 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
- MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1445 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
- MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1433 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1442 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1150 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or MiniMax-M3?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M3 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-M3 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and MiniMax-M3 share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.