# MiMo-V2-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 5 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 38.3 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash and 47% for MiniMax-M2.7.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.7.
- MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 138 | 196 |
| Context | 262K | 205K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | 1398 |
| SciCode | 25.9% | 47% |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1454 |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | 599.25 |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2-Flash: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1422 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.85 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1420 |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1444 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1405 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1419 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1412 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or MiniMax-M2.7?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.7 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.