# MiMo-V2-Flash vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 43.8 to 36.1.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2-Pro.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 138 | 103 |
| Context | 262K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | 785.17 |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1447 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1478 |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1445 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.