# MiMo-V2-Flash vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 43.3 to 36.1.
- Both cost about the same: $0.14 input and $0.28 output per million tokens.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 43.6 |
| Rank | 138 | 88 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1466 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1445 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1430 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1449 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2-Flash: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1434 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1428 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1445 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.