# MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs QwQ-32B

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and QwQ-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 34.9.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.7 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 55 | 153 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1538 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | 1326 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1497 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1548 | 1323 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
- QwQ-32B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1265 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1532 | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | 1297 |
| LMArena French | — | 1337 |
| LMArena German | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1500 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1463 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than QwQ-32B?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or QwQ-32B better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and QwQ-32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.