# MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 35.8.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.7 | 33.8 |
| Rank | 55 | 229 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | — |
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1538 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1497 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1548 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1265 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1532 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1500 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1463 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.