# MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3.6 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (46.7 vs 47.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-qwen3-6-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 43.0.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Qwen3.6 Plus.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.7 | 47.3 |
| Rank | 55 | 54 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | $3 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | 1461 |
| LMArena Coding | 1538 | 1467 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | 1449 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.67 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1497 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1548 | 1456 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1265 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1532 | 1478 |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | 1434 |
| LMArena French | — | 1454 |
| LMArena German | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1425 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1500 | 1440 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1405 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1463 | 1438 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3.6 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (46.7 vs 47.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Plus lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 40.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.