# MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 40.1.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 49 | 71 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | 1487 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1629 | — |
| SciCode | 60.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,158 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 59.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1512 | 1483 |
| CritPt | 26.6% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1494 | 1474 |
| ProofBench | 70% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1543 | 1489 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | 1534 |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | 1471 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1493 | 1467 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1501 | 1476 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1492 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1468 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | 1478 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.