# MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3-1.7B

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-qwen3-1-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 16.3.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 26.6 |
| Rank | 49 | 336 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1629 | — |
| SciCode | 60.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,158 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 59.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 26.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1512 | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| ProofBench | 70% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1494 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1543 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1493 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1501 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1492 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen3-1.7B?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3-1.7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.