# MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen1.5-7B

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-qwen1-5-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.9 to 29.8.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.7 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 55 | 270 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1538 | 1107 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | 1066 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1497 | 1080 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1548 | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
- Qwen1.5-7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1265 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1532 | 1140 |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | 1006 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1058 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1500 | 1090 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1463 | 1061 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen1.5-7B?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen1.5-7B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.