# MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen-VL Max

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Qwen-VL Max does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-qwen-vl-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 1 category and Qwen-VL Max in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multimodal, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 40.2 to 31.6.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $3.20 for Qwen-VL Max.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.7 | 35.3 |
| Rank | 55 | — |
| Context | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | $0.80 |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | $3.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
- Qwen-VL Max: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1538 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
- Qwen-VL Max: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
- Qwen-VL Max: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1497 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
- Qwen-VL Max: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1548 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
- Qwen-VL Max: 31.6 (#97)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1265 | 1212 |
| Video-MME | — | 51.3% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 32% |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
- Qwen-VL Max: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1532 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
- Qwen-VL Max: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
- Qwen-VL Max: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1500 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
- Qwen-VL Max: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen-VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1463 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen-VL Max?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Qwen-VL Max does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen-VL Max?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Qwen-VL Max lists at $0.80 and $3.20.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen-VL Max share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-VL Max has 3.