# MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Phi-4 Mini

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 4.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-phi-4-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Phi-4 Mini in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 55.5 to 28.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 60.9% for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and 10.8% for Phi-4 Mini.
- Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 30.9 |
| Rank | 49 | 283 |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | $0.075 |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | $0.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
- Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 60.9% | 10.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1629 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,158 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 59.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
- Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 26.6% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1512 | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 70% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1494 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
- Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1543 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1493 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1501 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1492 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Phi-4 Mini?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 4.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Phi-4 Mini?

Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Phi-4 Mini share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.