# MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Phi-3.5-mini

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-phi-3-5-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 55.5 to 34.6.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 49 | — |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
- Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1629 | — |
| SciCode | 60.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,158 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 59.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 26.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1512 | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 70% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1494 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1543 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1493 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1501 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1492 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Phi-3.5-mini?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Phi-3.5-mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.