# MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.9 to 46.4.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 46.7 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 55 | 191 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1538 | 1292 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | 1272 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1497 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1548 | 1294 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1265 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1532 | 1241 |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | 1193 |
| LMArena French | — | 1262 |
| LMArena German | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1288 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1246 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1500 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1463 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.