# MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-olmo-2-furious-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 23.1.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 49 | 304 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1629 | — |
| SciCode | 60.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,158 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 59.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 26.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1512 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 70% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1494 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1543 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1493 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1501 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1492 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1468 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.