# MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.9 to 42.3.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 46.7 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 55 | 248 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1538 | 1210 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | 1208 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1497 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1548 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1265 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1532 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | 1187 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1500 | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1463 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.