# MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 42.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 43.4.
- Both cost about the same: $0.43 input and $0.87 output per million tokens.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 46.7 | 42.4 |
| Rank | 55 | 102 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | 1538 | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1497 | 1447 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1548 | 1479 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1265 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1532 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | — | 1470 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1458 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | 1444 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1500 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1463 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 42.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 43.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.