# MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 55.5 to 36.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 60.9% for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 49 | 138 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1629 | 1330 |
| SciCode | 60.9% | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,158 | 737.95 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 59.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 26.6% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1512 | 1420 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1494 | 1396 |
| ProofBench | 70% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1543 | 1425 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | 1462 |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1493 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1501 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1492 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1468 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.
