# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-tulu-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 37.4 to 13.3.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 32.6 |
| Rank | 74 | 242 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | 1236 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1220 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1477 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | 1246 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1233 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | 1224 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.