# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Ring-2.6-1T

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 2 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 53.4 to 40.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 51.3% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and 42.4% for Ring-2.6-1T.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 55 | — |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 51.3% | 42.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 12% | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1468 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | — |
| LMArena French | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Ring-2.6-1T?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Ring-2.6-1T share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.