# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3 Max

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 43.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen3 Max in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 22.6.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $6 for Qwen3 Max.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 43.7 |
| Rank | 55 | 87 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
- Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1456 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | — |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1448 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.38 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
- Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1468 | 1446 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1455 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
- Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | 1475 | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1462 |
| LMArena German | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1399 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
- Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1419 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1438 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
- Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Qwen3 Max?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 43.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3 Max?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max lists at $1.20 and $6.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Qwen3 Max share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.