# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 55.5.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 74 | 186 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | 1413 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1275 |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 461.45 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1372 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.5% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1477 | 1364 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | 1337 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | 1345 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | 1356 |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | 1367 |
| LMArena French | — | 1394 |
| LMArena German | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1307 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1360 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1356 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | 1379 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | 1356 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 1365 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 36.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.