# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3-1.7B

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-qwen3-1-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 42.0 to 19.6.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 26.2 |
| Rank | 74 | 331 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.5 (#108)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 18.5 (#263)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 15.4 (#288)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1477 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#273)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Qwen3-1.7B?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Qwen3-1.7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.