# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen2-72B

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 53.4 to 29.1.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 55 | 300 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
- Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1196 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | — |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —
- Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
- Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1191 |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.28 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
- Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1468 | 1235 |
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1171 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
- Qwen2-72B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
- Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1475 | 1170 |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1169 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
- Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1181 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1192 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
- Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1196 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Qwen2-72B?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Qwen2-72B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.