# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 49.5.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 74 | 179 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | 1314 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1299 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1477 | 1298 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | 1289 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | 1271 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.