# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Pixtral Large

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-pixtral-large
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Pixtral Large in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 32.9.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 55 | 259 |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $2 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | — |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
- Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1468 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
- Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | 1089 |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | — |
| LMArena French | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
- Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Pixtral Large?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Pixtral Large?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Pixtral Large share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.