# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs phi-3-medium 14B

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 42.2 to 9.1.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 55 | 306 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | — |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1468 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | — |
| LMArena French | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than phi-3-medium 14B?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.