# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 50.4.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 74 | 168 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | 1346 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1322 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1477 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | 1307 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1337 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1298 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.