# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Mistral Nemo

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-mistral-nemo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 28.5.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 26.4 |
| Rank | 55 | 337 |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | — |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —
- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
- Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
- Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1468 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | — |
| LMArena French | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
- Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Mistral Nemo?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Mistral Nemo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.