# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Ministral 3B

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 4.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-ministral-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 42.0 to 10.4.
- Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.04 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 25.6 |
| Rank | 74 | 336 |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.04 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $0.04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
- Ministral 3B: 17.7 (#278)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| DTBench | — | 51.7% |
| LMCA | — | 5.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.08 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
- Ministral 3B: 24.5 (#257)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1477 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.4% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
- Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#297)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 25.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Ministral 3B?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 4.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Ministral 3B?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.04 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Ministral 3B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.