# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 22.1.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 55 | 103 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1476 |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1468 | 1447 |
| ProofBench | 63% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1478 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1475 | 1469 |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1457 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1445 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 43.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.