# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 9 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- Both cost about the same: $0.14 input and $0.28 output per million tokens.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 74 | 91 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | 1467 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1445 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1477 | 1432 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | 1449 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | 1228 |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | 1469 |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | 1412 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1318 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1428 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 42.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.