# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 53.4 to 36.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 51.3% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
- Both cost about the same: $0.14 input and $0.28 output per million tokens.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 55 | 138 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | 1330 |
| SciCode | 51.3% | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 12% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1420 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1468 | 1396 |
| ProofBench | 63% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1425 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1475 | 1429 |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1420 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

### Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.