# MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

> MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.4 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 44.2 to 37.0.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $2 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.4 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 93 | 102 |
| Context | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $2 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1440 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1428 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 66.7% |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1440 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.7% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1417 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 63% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1247 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1407 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | 1460 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1413 |
| LMArena German | 1421 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1306 | 1395 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 1364 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | 1435 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | 1389 |
| IFEval | — | 81% |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 1403 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 55.6% |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1334 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1416 |
| WildBench | — | 80.7% |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.4 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct lists at $0.50 and $2.

### Is MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 42.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.