# MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 43.9 to 35.5.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.4 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 93 | 190 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | 1275 |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1412 |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | 461.45 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.2% |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.5: —
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1372 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.5% |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1365 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1338 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1247 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1346 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | 1357 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1398 |
| LMArena German | 1421 | 1325 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1306 | 1310 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 1305 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1366 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | 1360 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | 1355 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 1378 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | 1357 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1365 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

### Is MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.