# MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.6 Flash

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-qwen3-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 3 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.19 / $1.13 for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 38.4 |
| Rank | 89 | 176 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $1.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | 326.4 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1436 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1459 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | — |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1412 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1444 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3.6 Flash?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Flash lists at $0.19 and $1.13.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.