# MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 56.4 to 52.0.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 44.7 |
| Rank | 89 | 72 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1488 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1483 |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1473 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1459 | 1489 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1483 |
| LMArena German | 1421 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1304 | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1412 | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1467 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1444 | 1477 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1478 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.6 vs 43.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.