# MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3-4B

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-qwen3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 28.6 to 19.2.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.4 | 31.9 |
| Rank | 93 | 264 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.5: —
- Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
- Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
- Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1436 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
- Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1247 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | — |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Qwen3-4B?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3-4B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.