# MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.6 to 49.4.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.4 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 93 | 181 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1314 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1299 |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1298 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1289 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1247 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1421 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1306 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.