# MiMo-V2.5 vs Phi-4 Mini

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-phi-4-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 3 categories and Phi-4 Mini in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 43.9 to 28.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 43.1% for MiMo-V2.5 and 10.8% for Phi-4 Mini.
- Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2.5.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.4 | 30.9 |
| Rank | 93 | 283 |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.075 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $0.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
- Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 43.1% | 10.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
- Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 3.7% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1436 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
- Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1247 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | — |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Phi-4 Mini?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Phi-4 Mini?

Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5 lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

### Is MiMo-V2.5 or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Phi-4 Mini share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.