# MiMo-V2.5 vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-phi-3-mini-128k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.6 to 27.1.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.4 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 93 | 305 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1039 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1028 |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1089 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 984 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1247 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | 1016 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1039 |
| LMArena German | 1421 | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1306 | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | 1059 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | 1023 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 996 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 989 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.5 or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.